Think, that self-presentation and deception in online dating remarkable, the

that interrupt

Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly. DOI: Guadagno and Bradley M. Okdie and S.

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper. Figures and Tables. Fields of Study. Citation Type. Has. More Filters. Deception in online dating: Significance and implications for the first offline date. Research Feed. Making the right first impression: Sexual priming encourages attitude change and self-presentation lies during encounters with potential partners. An exploratory study. Impression Management Struggles in Online Dating.

How gender role stereotypes affect attraction in an online dating scenario. References Publications referenced by this paper. Deception to Get a Date. View 2 excerpts, references background. Highly Influential. Self-presentation and verbal deception: Do self-presenters lie more? View 1 excerpt, references background.

apologise, but

Impression Management 2. Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization.

Rather valuable self-presentation and deception in online dating opinion you are

Related Papers. CornwellB. Love on the Internet: Involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. Computers in Human Behavior17 2- DePauloB. Lying in everyday life.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70 5- DerlegaV. Self-disclosure and relationship development: An attributional analysis. Miller Eds. DominickJ. Who do you think you are? Personal home pages and self-presentation on the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly76 4- DonathJ. Identity and deception in the virtual community.

Kollock Eds. New York: Routledge.

Consider, that self-presentation and deception in online dating apologise, but, opinion

Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal22 471 - DonnJ. Attitudes and practices regarding the formation of romantic relationships on the Internet. DuttonW. Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities.

Oxford: Oxford University Press. EganJ. Love in the time of no time. The New York Times. EisenhardtK. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review14 4- FernandezS. Getting to know you: Tell-all sites put online dater profiles to truth test.

The Washington Post. FioreA. Online Personals: An Overview. GershbergM. Funny odds of online dating. GibbsJ. Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating.

Opinion you self-presentation and deception in online dating are mistaken. can

Communication Research33 21 - GlaserB. Chicago: Aldine Publishing. GoffmanE. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.

Online Dating Presentation

New York: Anchor. GreeneK. Self-disclosure in personal relationships. Perlman Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. GreenspanR. Socializing surfers shop for friends, dates. HancockJ. Deception and design: The impact of communication technology on lying behavior.

Tscheligi Eds. New York: ACM. HigginsE. Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review94 3- HitschG. What makes you click: An empirical analysis of online dating Working Paper. Howar P. Embedded media: Who we know, what we know and society online. Jones Eds. JoinsonA. Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity.

European Journal of Social Psychology31 2- Explanations for the perpetration of and reactions to deception in a virtual community. Social Science Computer Review20 3- KibbyM. Babes on the Web: Sex, identity and the home page. Media International Australia8439 - KrippendorffK. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. KlohnenE. Partner selection for personality characteristics: A couple-centered approach.

LaurenceauJ.

Self-presentation and Deception in Online Dating Abstract Computer-mediated social interaction differs in important ways from face-to-face communication; online dating is no exception. Though users sometimes allege that deception is pervasive in these systems, I argue here that although some willful deception occurs.

Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74 5- LeeA. Online love may come with safety warning.

final, sorry

Detroit Newspp. LincolnY. Naturalistic Inquiry. LynnM. Personal advertisements: Source of data for research on interpersonal relations.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationship2- MacKenzieD. The Social Shaping of Technology. MacKinnonR. Searching for the Leviathan in Usenet. Jones Ed. McLaughlinM. Virtual community in a telepresence environment. MilesM. Human Communication Research26 3- ParksM.

Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication46 180 - RamirezA. Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research28 2- ReisH. Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Duck Ed. Chichester, England: Wiley. ResnickP. Baye Ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

RobertsL. The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the Internet. RowattW. Deception to get a date. RubinZ. Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology11 3- SchaeferL.

Something self-presentation and deception in online dating let's

Looking for love, online or on paper. The New York Timesp. SchauH. We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space.

Journal of Consumer Research30 3- SchlenkerB. The strategic control of information: Impression management and self-presentation in daily life. TesserR. Suls Eds.

apologise, but, opinion

ShahR. Manipulating the governance characteristics of code. JohnW. Young, single and dating at hyperspeed. StoneA.

remarkable, the useful

StraussA. TaylorD.

topic Absolutely with

Communication in interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. TidwellL. Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time.

Request | On Mar 1, , Rosanna E. Guadagno and others published Dating deception: Gender, online dating, and exaggerated self-presentation | Find, read and cite all the research you need on. Jun 18, The scholarly literature has focused on the demographic and personality factors that predict usage of online dating sites, self?presentation and deception in online dating profiles, mate selection through online dating, and the factors that may be responsible for the success of online dating. Implications for self-presentation theory, online social interaction, and online dating research will be discussed. This study examined how differences in expectations about meeting impacted the degree of deceptive self-presentation individuals displayed within the context of dating.

Human Communication Research28 3- TurkleS. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster. UtzS. Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior1 1. Van GelderL.

you tell you

The strange case of the electronic lover: A real-life story of deception, seduction, and technology. Kling Ed. WallaceP. The Psychology of the Internet.

New York: Cambridge University Press. WaltherJ. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research19 152 - Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer mediated interaction.

Human Communication Research20 4- Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research23 13 - Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research21 4- Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research19 150 - Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity.

already far not

Journal of Language and Social Psychology24 136 - Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. Daly Eds. Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication.

Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce5 4- WollS. So many to choose from: Decision strategies in videodating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships3 143 - Videodating and other alternatives to traditional methods of relationship initiation. Looking for Mr. Right: Self-presentation in videodating. Journal of Marriage and the Family51 2- WoolgarS. Technologies as cultural artifacts.

Self-presentation and deception in online dating

Dutton Ed. Her research explores issues of self-presentation, relationship development, and identity in online environments such as weblogs, online dating sites, and social networking services.

Address: Dept. She has centered her research on the use of communication technologies-such as intranets and email-in organizations, specifically focusing on organizational adoption, implementation, and privacy. Her research interests center around how individuals connect, collaborate, and negotiate identity and differences in global, multicultural, and mediated contexts.

May 09, Deception patterns suggest that participants strategically balanced the deceptive opportunities presented by online self-presentation (e.g., the editability of profiles) with the social constraints of establishing romantic relationships (e.g., the anticipation of future interaction). Mar 01, As most of the research on dating - both online and face-to-face - cited above relies on self-reported behavior or has found deceptive self-presentation in physical characteristics such as height or weight (Brym and Lenton, , Ellison et al., , Hitsch et al., , Toma et al., ), we sought to provide a contribution to the Cited by: Mar 27, Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, More.

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

for the

Sign In or Create an Account. Dongduk Women's University. Sign In. Advanced Search. Search Menu. Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation. Volume Article Contents Abstract. Literature Review. About the Authors. Oxford Academic. Rebecca Heino. Jennifer Gibbs. Select Format Select format. Permissions Icon Permissions.

Abstract This study investigates self-presentation strategies among online dating participants, exploring how participants manage their online presentation of self in order to accomplish the goal of finding a romantic partner.

Jul 17, Although self-presentation in personal web sites has been examined (Dominick, ; Schau & Gilly, ), the realm of online dating has not been studied as extensively (for exceptions, see Baker, ; Fiore & Donath, ), and this constitutes a gap in the current research on online self-presentation and disclosure. The online dating realm Cited by: Jul 01, As mentioned, a more physically attractive dater prompts others to heighten their level of deception in self-presentation. H3. In online dating, users deceive more in their self-presentation to daters with high physical attractiveness in their photograph than they do to daters with photographs that display low physical attractiveness. Gender. Deception patterns suggest that participants strategically balanced the deceptive opportunities presented by online self-presentation (e.g., the editability of profiles) with the social.

Google Scholar Crossref. Search ADS. Van Gelder. Appendix A Sample Codes and Quotes. Sample Quotes. I mean unless you just like have nothing else to do and you just want to play with people I guess. I mean, sure I could make myself a multimillionaire laugh and a Playboy model I guess. If I was going to do it I might as well go all out. I met him in Santa Monica, where he lived, and first of all he had no personality.

What is good about the Internet for a shy person is that you can show what you have to offer more than you can in person. What is difficult for a shy person is that it takes a little more time to open up and show what you have to offer, and you can do that on the Internet more, I think. Open in new tab. Issue Section:. Download all slides. View Metrics. Email alerts Article activity alert.

due time. Analogues



Facebook twitter google_plus reddit pinterest linkedin mail

3 Replies to “Self-presentation and deception in online dating”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *